The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient is {{ icc.toFixed(4) }}.

Calculation Process:

1. Apply the ICC formula:

ICC = VOI / (VOI + UV)

{{ voi.toFixed(2) }} / ({{ voi.toFixed(2) }} + {{ uv.toFixed(2) }}) = {{ icc.toFixed(4) }}

Share
Embed

ICC (Intraclass Correlation) Calculator

Created By: Neo
Reviewed By: Ming
LAST UPDATED: 2025-03-31 07:59:22
TOTAL CALCULATE TIMES: 115
TAG:

The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) is a critical statistical tool used to measure the reliability and consistency of ratings or measurements made by different observers or judges. This guide provides an in-depth exploration of ICC, including its definition, calculation formula, practical examples, and frequently asked questions.


What is Intraclass Correlation (ICC)?

Definition:

ICC is a statistical metric that quantifies the degree of agreement between multiple raters or judges when evaluating the same variable. It assesses how closely related the ratings are, making it invaluable for studies involving inter-rater reliability.

Key Applications:

  • Clinical research: Evaluating the consistency of medical diagnoses.
  • Psychology: Measuring agreement between therapists or counselors.
  • Education: Assessing the reliability of grading systems.
  • Sports science: Determining the consistency of performance evaluations.

An ICC value ranges from 0 to 1:

  • Close to 0: Indicates little to no agreement beyond chance.
  • Close to 1: Indicates strong agreement among raters.

ICC Formula: Simplify Complex Data Analysis with Precision

The ICC formula is as follows:

\[ ICC = \frac{VOI}{VOI + UV} \]

Where:

  • ICC: Intraclass Correlation Coefficient
  • VOI: Variance of Interest (the variability attributed to the actual differences in the measured variable)
  • UV: Unwanted Variance (the variability due to measurement error or inconsistency among raters)

This formula calculates the proportion of variance attributable to the variable of interest compared to the total variance.


Practical Example: Calculating ICC Step-by-Step

Scenario:

Suppose you're conducting a study where three judges evaluate the performance of students on a test. You want to determine the reliability of their scores.

Given Data:

  • Variance of Interest (VOI): 25
  • Unwanted Variance (UV): 5

Steps:

  1. Plug values into the ICC formula: \[ ICC = \frac{25}{25 + 5} = \frac{25}{30} = 0.8333 \]
  2. Interpretation: An ICC of 0.8333 indicates strong agreement among the judges.

FAQs About ICC: Expert Insights for Reliable Results

Q1: What does a high ICC value mean?

A high ICC value (close to 1) signifies excellent agreement between raters, suggesting minimal measurement error and consistent evaluations.

Q2: How do I interpret ICC results in research?

Interpretation depends on the context:

  • Below 0.40: Poor reliability
  • 0.40–0.59: Fair reliability
  • 0.60–0.74: Good reliability
  • Above 0.75: Excellent reliability

Q3: Can ICC be negative?

No, ICC cannot be negative because it represents a proportion of variance, which is always non-negative. If your calculations result in a negative ICC, recheck your data for errors.


Glossary of Terms

Variance of Interest (VOI): The portion of variance attributed to the actual differences in the measured variable.

Unwanted Variance (UV): Variability caused by measurement error or inconsistencies among raters.

Inter-rater Reliability: The degree to which different raters agree in their assessments.

Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC): A statistical measure assessing the consistency or agreement of ratings across multiple raters.


Interesting Facts About ICC

  1. Versatility: ICC can be applied across various fields, including healthcare, psychology, education, and sports science.
  2. Types of ICC: There are multiple types of ICC (e.g., one-way random effects, two-way random effects), each suited for different research designs.
  3. Impact of Sample Size: Larger sample sizes generally improve the accuracy and reliability of ICC estimates.
  4. Beyond Agreement: ICC not only measures agreement but also helps identify systematic biases in ratings.